Notes from my presentation, delivered at OKCon in the Open Culture session on 18th Sept. 2013.
Doc available on Scribd:
Although I didn’t use my slides in the end, the presentation that I put together is available on Slideshare:
Notes from my presentation, delivered at OKCon in the Open Culture session on 18th Sept. 2013.
Doc available on Scribd:
Although I didn’t use my slides in the end, the presentation that I put together is available on Slideshare:
– Victoria Stodden, Professor of Statistics, Columbia University
@victoriastrodden on role of computation in scientific research. Donoho: says that its not the published article that is the scholarship, the article is the advertisment the scholarly contribution.
We need to update the scientific record.
Branch 1: deductive – with the idea of the proof
Branch 2: empirical – with the idea of hypothesis testing, and structured methods (protocols)
So add Branch 3/4?: computational – large scale simulations, data driven computational science. Using big data. – what do we have here? to qualify the findings? Scientific method is to root out error. And computational science today doesn’t generate reliable knowledge. So the availability of code, in order to verify it, is essential.
Victoria’s slides are here: http://t.co/Iq7VY7YonL
We shouldn’t need a special language to discuss the reproducibility of experiments. Of scientific enquiry.
For the future of health and medicine to become personalized, preventive and predictive is also needs to become participatory. The need for millions of health data sets requires the active participation of healthy individuals and patients. This will be promoted by empowering individuals by giving them control over their health data (medical, omics, mHealth etc). In healthbank, a Swiss health databank, citizens from all over the world can securely store, manage, and contribute anonymized selected health data for research. Since healthbank is organized as a cooperative, members not only control their data, they are also owners of healthbank and share its profits.
Health Data platform: http://datenundgesundheit.ch
– Kaitlin Thaney, Director, Mozilla Science Lab
Despite the influx of tools and policies under development to advance the broader goal of open science, we’re still facing a critical gap in our education system. The newly launched Mozilla Science Lab, an open science project supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, is looking to help close that gap in skills development so that making research more efficient isn’t only accessible to the chosen elite. This talk will look at some of the broader issues surrounding disrupting the current educational system, and explore what “digital literacy” looks like for science, so we can better arm the next generation of researchers (as well as the PIs and advisors) with the skills to truly enact change.
@kaythaney of @mozillascience
Kaitlin talking about OpenNews project.
Open web to change the way that science is done. A key to this is digital literacy (@mozteach). They’ve run a MOOC about teaching using the web. Science is becoming more data driven. There is a skills gap developing.
Mozilla Science Lab:
All of these layers are interdependent on one another:
Software Carpentry Programme: http://software-carpentry.org/v4/invperc/
It’s all about making sure that education is producing professionals who have the skills that are necessary for 21st century jobs.
Kaitlin’s blog: http://kaythaney.com/
“Reliance on ad-hoc, self-education about what’s possible doesn’t scale.”
– Puneet Kishor, Project Coordinator for Science and Data, Creative Commons (CC)
As a small organization with a global ambition, reach, and footprint, CC is only as strong as its community.
CC can’t be everywhere, and that is where its community steps in, using CC licenses, promoting the values underlying those licenses, and championing openness.
In keeping with CC’s vision of “realizing the full potential of the Internet — universal access to research and education, full participation in culture — to drive a new era of development, growth, and productivity”, one of the core strategic objectives of CC Science is to “Grow the Community.”
CC Science Affiliates Network aims to strengthen CC’s science outreach by: including local and regional scientific voices in the global conversation on open science; making CC more responsive to scientific concerns worldwide; and providing scientists who are friendly toward open science and access the full power of a global community. We will introduce the CC Science Affiliates Network, highlight synergies between it and OKFN’s outreach programs such as the OKFN Ambassadors program, and invite participation from the OKFN community.
Openness is not evenly distributed.
CC has lots of volunteers, called CC Affiliates.
At a recent meeting of CC Affiliates, Puneet noted that there were very few Scientists from developing countries represented. So this needs to change. Most affiliates are from a legal background, mostly because of the way that CC developed.
Science Affiliates Network.
OKF is the mechanism whereby CC and its vision is achieved. i.e. “Realising the full potential of the internet”
The facets of open education. Resources, data and culture – Panel & LinkedUp Awards presentations
Tuesday 17 September, 11:45 – 13:15 @ Room 13, Floor 2
Open data is data that can be freely used, reused and redistributed by anyone. Many institutes offer Open Educational Resources (OER) online. Education can benefit highly from open and linked data approaches.
Moderator: Doug Belshaw, Badges & Skills Lead, Mozilla Foundation
– See more at: http://okcon.org/more-open-topics/#education-session-1
@jackiecarter said: Co-existence of open and closed data.
@jackiecarter said: It’s not just about releasing the data, is about creating products for that data.
Respecting rights. Using CC and respecting people’s ownership.
Identifying derivative works is the challenge.
My tweets from the session – in reverse order!:
Tuesday 17 September, 09:15 – 09:45 @ Main Stage
Ellen Miller, CEO, Sunlight Foundation
Examples of opportunity:
— Open Government Partnership
— Open Data Portals (there are 43 country level portals, and over 100 area portals). Including city level portals.
“The win isn’t getting the open data portal itself. The win is the impact that the open portal can have.”
— International Transparency Organisations. Check out the list here, and add to it if you have an example that is not yet there: http://bit.ly/globalngo
Ellen asks does our work (Sunlight Foundation) live up to the open data potential to change things? Do we have more trust in Government? Ellen says No. Due to:
Usual startup problems. Taking on too much work, taking too long to work out problems, working out how to relate to politicians, how to deal with the bad actors, are minor incremental reforms good enough? we’re inconsistent: should we model how govts should do their work, or should we do their work for them? I.e. make the tools for them. How should we measure our impact? how do people want to use govt data <– need to know this so that we can match their need.
— Independent position is needed – Away from politicians. Naming and shaming is very important. As is praising the good work.
— Building tools for average citizens isn’t as smart. We need to work with engaged constituencies.
— Fundamental questions of state and political power are actually key to our work. The influence of money and politics will only grow, and this threatens our ability to create accountability. This is a problem that we need to find a way around. i.e. the new surveillance powers of the US and the influence that this could have on our experience of the internet.
We need to set a standard of what we mean by open data, and then ensure that govts adhere to it.
Govt agencies have to use technologies to invite us (people) into a meaningful dialogue, to participate in the major decisions that impact on our lives.
Tuesday 17 September, 09:45 – 11:15 @ Main Stage Room 2
Moderator: Sarah Schacht, transparency technology advisor and author
Chris Taggart, Co-founder, OpenCorporates
The arguments for open data are often perceived as being about liberating a public good, but open data has another, more subtle benefit: increased quality. This presentation will use OpenCorporates’ new corporate network data features to demonstrate how open data can address the quality and collective action problems that plague proprietary datasets, and provide efficient feedback mechanisms for open data publishers, governments and data users.
Data quality issues:
— Data accuracy
— Gaps in data
We can’t look at companies in isolation. They are all part of a huge network of other companies. So we need to consider them in relation to other companies’ activities.
Open data on a global stage. Talked about the G8 Open Data Charter.
Global activism on the local stage.
The “nature of the government processes are important in their own right.”
data.gov.uk is a place where interactions occur. Data users communicate with Cabinet Office team.
We’re trying to get the dataset of the datasets! We need to know what there is to ask for it to become data.
The National Information Infrastructure <– critical datasets that need to be made available (at high quality).
It’s how we interact/collaborate. Team blogs, Twitter, etc. As a civil servant these things make my accountability to the civil society feel different to the past. Very different to the consultation process, which is less interactive.
How can we, as a government, interact better with the community on open data?
How can this interaction evolve after all the data is released? So after all of the data that is going to be released, has been released (only a couple of years away):
— open policy making team – learning from examples like MindLab in Denmark: www.mind-lab.dk/en
— internal insights
Andreas Kellerhals, Director, Swiss Federal Archives
We will look first at the availability of data and their supposed value for a public use, illustrated with some real life examples. Secondly, we’re interested in the added value of data analysis for administrative work and an opening toward a kind of data driven political participation. We will, thirdly, address questions of public responsibilities and due diligences. Fourthly, the urgent need for methodological skills when working with open data or public sector information will be a topic as well as, fifthly, possible retroactive impacts on government data.
Shows some gorgeous images of historical publications of government data.
Publishing statistics of government data has a long history. As an instrument of propaganda in 17th and 18th century. e.g. Stanford visualisation of enlightment correspondence. http://www.stanford.edu/group/toolingup/rplviz/rplviz.swf
Swiss Open Government Data: http://opendata.admin.ch
Much of the data was already available, but not all in one place. 1617 datasets.
The portal will now be tested for 6 months or so. Hopefully the community will get involved.
Example: http://hydrodaten.admin.ch data, resulting in Aare App: https://itunes.apple.com/ch/app/aare-schwimm-wetter-temperatur/id375825664?mt=8
As this develops, we will move away from facts and figures, and towards issues of methodology. example of University of Massachusetts, what could the effects of an error in data mean? See The Excel Depression, Paul Krugman: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/opinion/krugman-the-excel-depression.html?_r=0
– Andrew Alspach, Senior Information Management Officer UNHCR
UNHCR, the United Nations Refugee agency has taken many steps in the last year to expose anonymized data related to the people we serve for use by the humanitarian community. The organization has realized and embraced the fact that opening up data results in informed decision making and ultimately saving lives. While blogs and the twitter–sphere are rumbling with the need and intention to “open” data, UNHCR is committed to becoming a leader in this area through tangible actions for the humanitarian community and the people we are committed to providing assistance. Our talk will highlight the technical, innovative, and responsible ways that UNHCR is contributing in this area.
A goal of the High Commissioner, since 2011 UNHCR has changed its approach and policies to sharing data necessary for collective and effective action in humanitarian response. The recent emergencies in Mali and Syria, among others, have shown the critical importance of a humanitarian response based on a shared understanding of the needs and capacities of those displaced by conflict and natural disaster. UNHCR recognizes that unless the true condition, risks and resources of a population is known and shared collectively, the effectiveness of a collective response is severely compromised. This requires a cultural revolution within a protection agency such as UNHCR, holder of some of the most sensitive data of any international organisation. The talk will share specific experiences and changes UNHCR has adopted in regard to policies and tools for sharing data with the past year, as well as how we ensure opening of data without opening risks to rights, security and protection of refugees globally.
Open data for the protection of refugees and the delivery of services to displaced peoples and people in need of help.
Andrew is beginning with a 5star.info slide. UNHCR use the 5 star rating for opening their data. They’re at the 2-3 star level now.
Aiming for some of the data to be 5 stars by the middle of next year.
Websites that deal with emergencies:
The Syrian platform has evolved from a series of PDFs to having an entire dump in csv available. Daily updates are also available in csv. The information was already public, but now is extractable. And is still improving.
Population Statistics, bi-annual. Was a PDF document, 3 months ago was converted to a searchable, downloadable database. Working on visualisations.
Beginning of this:
Open Map Data. We want to provide services to our communities. Shows a web feature service and web mapping service, available for GIS specialists to use.
Different kinds of datasets: Common operational datasets & fundamental operational datasets.
Humanitarian Exchange Language: http://hxl.humanitarianresponse.info/docs/index.php
HXL is the name of the lang.
Analytical aspects of considering open data.
Its about how we can use data for action.
How is the web growing? Can we apply models to this to understand how the web is growing?
The web as a network of networks.
Looking at the UK Govt Open Data Community.
Consists of multistakeholders (govt, academics, civic society, lobbyists, developers, citizens). Active both online and offline.
What Ramine is doing:
How is the community established? how is it developing? what are the implications for adopting Open Data in the UK?
Mix of quanitative and qualitative data: including: interviews, harvesting data, etc.
There were previous open data, open source, open knowledge communities; Academic research groups involved in Web Technologies and Knoweldge Representation; Civic Society involved in transparency; Public Sector Information committees in Government.
Ramine talked about the structure of the Open Government Data community. National level, regional level, local councils and authority stakeholders. And there are movements joining these. Such as the Open Govt Data Blog.
Open Data Communities have been active since 2009. Growth since then.
National level impacts:
It looks from the slides Ramine is showing that all of the above have been increasing since 2009.
City and council level impacts:
Impacts on other communities:
Very little of the Open Data is published as 5 star data. Less than 1%!
Data needs to be of value.
[That word keeps coming up here at DE2012.]
Bridging the gap between government actions and citizen knowledge.
Needs to be sustainable: Socially, technically, economically.
Dickinsons: 6th Senese Transport. Visualising Network Opportunities to Enable Fluid Tourism Destination Travel.
Tony Stockman: Using Low-cost devices to support non-visual interaction with diagrams.
Allowing visually impaired people use a haptic device to interact with a diagram software. But very expensive. Looking for an alternative, the team compared a falcon device (the hand-pen tool) with a Wacom pad.
Ruth Aylett: Heriott Watt University. Protoyping 3D smart textile surfaces for pervasive computing environment.
Interactive dance environmnet with smart costumes. Using a 3D printer to make thermochromic dyes in shoulder pads. 3D surfaces that can change colour, reacting differentially depending on the light on them. Now working on an environment which will allow you to coreograph the effects on the textile.
Caroline Leygue: Horizon, Nottingham: Changing energy Use Habits Through Implementation Intentions
Used mobile phones to monitor and change peoples energy use habits. To postpone energy to off-peak times. Two groups. 35 participants. The intentions technique made poeple specify how, when and where people were going to use things at off peak times. And the second group just said they were going to use off-peak times. The first group made a change.
Mark Davies: Nottingham: The Rural Digital Economy: the local market as an arena for digital economic consideration and design.
Developing an IT intervention. Doing initial ethnographic work. Plan is to develop an online market portal. Designing systems in the wild with the users. Building a trusts relationship with the community, market organisers and stall holders.
Missed the name! Brunel (Horizon): Open Design meets Open Science
How can the design world interact with the making community? Open design is a product where the design itself is open for anyone to use. But not everyone can be a designer of things (quotes Chris Anderson). So this research explores tools and techqniues so that a non-designer can participate in the design process. Citizen Science is a key.
Chris Phethean: Southampton: Measuring the Megaphone: How are charities using social meida for marketing?
What are charitable orgs doing on social media? But before you can measure something, you need to know what constitutes success. So this poster covers how orgs are using social media. And what the tools are that are being used. Triangulating what they think they’re doing, with what they’re actually doing on social media. The measurements are based on a framework of metrics that Chris is making. i.e. likes on Facebook. But this isn’t enough. So what metrics can provide an accurate measurement of engagment from a compaign. And of course the nature of the organsiation will affect the base line.
Will Fyson: Southampton: Dissemination through Disintermediation
Affect of the web on scholarly publishing. But there are still paper articles being shifted round (but as PDFs). Alot of scientific output isn’t covered by the academic peer-review journal system. But there are issues to consider such as knowledge sharing being very time consuming, and IP theft. The poster looks at what we can do to look at these concerns.
Phil Waddell: Southampton: The role of the web in the formation of political activists.
Going to look at how web technologies are being used in a live contest by going to protests. This uses qualitative methods, not just the more conventional apparoach of analysing the quantative data post-event. Aim is the identify what kinds of things are useful to get a sense of the global network of activists that are forming online. e.g. how can social media create instances of solidarity during a protest between people at the protest, and people in a different country?
Personal Containers Project
Connecting your web histories. Now collecting data in houses.
Name? Aberdeen: Towards an Ecosystem for Social Computation on the Web.
Using data. Provenance, policy, quality, linked to data, trust and reputation, workflow, surrounded by user, services, and crowd.
Eleonora Oreggia: Queen Mary and BBC: Touch-controlled panoramic video stremaing for film directing.
Stageview: A 360 degree view to support the interaction between film director and camera operator. Allows for remote direction. A film director can therefore be in a separate city, and instead of just seeing a frame, the director can see all around. ‘Sterams from a Linux system to an iPad. Unwrapping the image to a rectangle.
Aberdeen: WiSE: Wireless Internet Sensing Environment.
Camera traps to record wild animals. Based on sensors for movement. The data is retrospective, the researcher goes onto tthe site to collect the data. Often triggers wrongly. The idea is to develop a way to record stuff in the environment using a digital sensing platform – for internet enabled remote moitoring. This could be used for environment monitoring generally. Could also then be available for the public to see.
A. Sathiaseelan: Cambridge: PAWS: Public Access WiFi Service
Digital inclusion is a problem. People need access to the internet. There are lots of initiatives to provide superfast broadband connections. But there are infrastructural barriers. And socio-economic barriers. Why: Can’t afford it, can’t access it (i.e. don’t know how), see no use for it. This addresses access to essential public services. The solution involves multistakeholders.
End of session. Phew!
Tweeting Note: I’ve stopped tweeting during the papers as there is a screen underneath the speakers showing all of the #de2012 hashtag tweets, which I’m finding really distracting. So I’m afraid no more tweets from me during the papers, but I’ll try to tweet in the breaks, and will blog instead.
These are my scruffy notes from the first day at DE2012. I haven’t blogged the talks in detail, as all of the papers are available on the http://de2012.org website, so you can read them there. What follows is merely my own notes on the parts of the conference that I have found most useful.
Edward Cutrell (@edcutrell) of Microsoft Research India, gave an interesting talk about some of the projects that the organisation has been involved in. I live tweeted from this one, so have copied the tweets in below:
|@edcutrell of #microsoftresearchindia at #de2012 telling about evaluating prototypes for expanding communities and then scaling with orgs.|
|@edcutrell at #de2012: We go from technology to people then back to technology again. #CGNetSwara for #citizenjournalism sounds v. cool.|
|@edcutrell at #de2012. Alternative to #onelaptoponechild. Have multiple pointers for multiple users for one pc. For collaborative learning.|
|@edcutrell of #microsoftresearchindia at #de2012. Look up #MultiPoint for info on project. Continuum of sharing: i.e. split screens.|
|@edcutrell at #de2012 now talking about micro finance self help groups in india. Creating digital records without moving away from paper.|
|@edcutrell #de2012 Trialled mapping a standardised form onto a tablet/digital slate. Uses audio validation. Improved accuracy & efficiency.|
|@edcutrell #de2012 Actually audio output proved very popular; Particularly for illiterate members. Paper copy still important bec tangible.|
|@edcutrell at #de2012 But slates are expensive… Cue Android phones.|
|@edcutrell #de2012 #CGNetSwara now: “Voice is the most important thing in the developing works right now.” Mobile internet not that common.|
|@edcutrell #de2012: How do you manage communicating via system where language literacy’s so mixed? 25% no literacy 25% Eng. 25% Other lang.|
|@edcutrell #de2012 A voice-based wiki for citizen journalism. Great oral histories! Transcribed online. But users don’t have web access.|
|@edcutrell #de2012 So I wonder does this voice wiki have a use for inadvertent political activism?|
|@edcutrell #de2012 Find this citizen journalism project: http://cgnetswara.org Do you give people a voice if they can’t access the platform?|
|@edcutrell at #de2012: #ivrjunction is the platform for the system for citizen journalism. They’re looking for partners!|
|@edcutrell #de2012 Q&A now. On economic bus. models: Cutrell says there is no resistance to new tech. But additional work not appreciated.|
|@edcutrell #de2012 On justifying to stakeholders why R&D should happen. Unanticipated devs of course!|
|Ditto! MT:@PaulWatsonNcl: #de2012 Enjoyed @EdCutrell talk on MSR India.Exploiting low-tech solns, integrating w. current customs & practice|
Team use PROTEE project management approach.
Sprint teams has same core panel members, but bring in others from the wider #CATALYSTAS network. Impressive NodesXL visualisation of the network on Twitter.
The team ask for submissions from organisations who would like a Sprint event to create something that is easy to make but deals with a difficult issue. Organisations do not need to submit a complication proposal, only a paragraph is needed. The panel selects a project to carry out. The team have completed seven projects, only one wasn’t suggested by this method.
Example or an organisation supporting homeless people in Lancaster, called Signposts.
The project used RFIDs and Thermo Mini Printer to create a printer of timetables for visitors to Signposts.
The project is extended very soon in MOSI, Manchester in the form of a treasure hunt using RFID tags that explores the difficulties in locating resources that homeless people encounter. Look on the MOSI website for ‘#Pat Goes Wild’. See also #Patchworks
@SiDEResearch – has drop in centre in Dundee. With a focus on access to technology. Has a research pool of 800 users and 40 organisations to take part in research. Great for user perspectives.
The Tales of Technology project collected positive stories about use of technologies. The stories were recorded from a call out to all 800 users via email and newsletter. Many responded by email, some by post. 80 respondents. Many felt that their use of technologies was not notable, but it became clear during the recorded interviews that there were lots of unexpected brilliant positive stories.
Marianne told two great stories. Adam was interested in genealogy so searched for people who shared his surname through the internet and then emailed them all. Over a period of time he communicated with relations in lots of different countries and then via email invited 70 people to Scotland to visit their ancestral home. The visitors had a big impact on the local economy.
Marianne also told a great story about a lady who lost her husband who left a large collection of books. She decided to sell the books on Amazon (having decided that eBay was too complicated to use). Following her success, she started to buy books in secondhand and charity shops to sell through Amazon. She has never bought a single thing on Amazon, but has sold thousands of books.
The videos have been transcribed and have subtitles.
How does the project fit into social mobility?
Access to community groups?
Is there a model here for sharing stories and for giving training to people for using technologies?
The stories will be linked to information about the technologies mentioned in the videos, therefore providing a way to join up technologies with user experiences.
Digital Storytelling Model – and how to craft these.
Olga talked about one of her case studies: Ordnance Survey. Olga interviewed 5 managers at OS, interested in the Agency of Leaders.
|Manipulating existing technologies/skills||Shifting to new technologies/skills|
|OSMasterMapOSVectorMap District||Linked Data Web – GeoVationOpen Data|
Are exploitation and exploration mutually exclusive?
I attended the lunchtime briefing on the DE catapult for Connected Digital Economy. It was really interesting to hear about this scheme. I haven’t written notes as I found this pretty comprehensive record of the scheme elsewhere: https://connect.innovateuk.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=6593370&folderId=9473587&name=DLFE-103319.pdf
Identifying serendipity through storytelling. Carried out critical incident interviews as storytelling for data collection.
Interviewing techniques for conversational approaches to encouraging storytelling. Stephann would summarise the story, email it to the participant, who could amend the record if they chose to do so.
How do we summarise? This is the data analysis part. By identifying patterns in the circumstances:
Presenting data: Multiple options: YouTube stories, narrated stories, illustrated stories, radio stories, poster stories. And finally, exploiting findings through drama.
Reflecting on stories, to reveal a metalayer on serendipity as a phenomenon.
Heriott Watt University & SAGE
Persuasion: education can be about attitudes and behaviour as well as knowledge. In schools, this takes the form of PSHE. In adults, this could be education of health.
Storytelling as a narrative loop. The loop is important. Linking events emotionally.
World state changes, causes Actions causes Affective Change, causes Events causes World state changes.
Persuasion is all about affective change. But there is a disconnect between story and reality.
One way to do this is to use role play. Experiential learning. Need a facilitator. Development of perspective taking. Thinking differently about points of view. Creation of empathy is essential. It won’t work if it is too predictable, or if it is too formulaic, or if the immersion is broken.
Sense of presence:
You have to care about the digital character. Emotional involvement fostering.
Davis, 1994: Empathy is Cognitive (knowing) / Affective (experiencing).
Ruth gave the example of the FearNot project (virtual exploration of bullying for 9-11 year olds) and ORIENT project (Wii remotes on a large screen).
Empathic agents – influencing behaviours.
Check out the RIDERS, http://riders-project.net, the next event is at QMUL.
We split into groups to discuss how we used storytelling in our own research. Our group came up with the following uses that take place:
And under these headings, we used storytelling for:
The other groups talked about:
Colin facilitated an activity where we played the game Consequences, but using a conversation between a computer and a human. Then we discussed how collaborative storytelling occurs, in particular the role of chance and serendipity in this process.
We had a really good discussion at the end of the session for 15 minutes about the shift in focus from narrative to storytelling. Is this reflective of the shift in general? In museums, there is certainly much written about the shift from museum as knowledge producer, to the museum as a space/place/agent to facilitate knowledge production by/with audiences. E.g. User Generated Content.
Narrative is what you end up with when you combine:
There is more of the author in storytelling than in narrative.
|Passive Audience of…||Active Participant in…|
What is the impact of storytelling?
At the end of the day, I managed to get to the presentation on the results of the DE Impact Panel Review. This has been the most thought provoking thing so far at #de2012 for me.
Paul Nightingale began the session.
Research to Practice takes time. We should get the research out there and ensure that VALUE is realised in society.
Haldane idea that Government doesn’t choose research may hold true, but impact will ensure funding from the Government.
Science Research Council, 1965: Achieving impact focus early on.
In the UK, DE is having a tangible impact on:
Need to manage impact more strategically: Record, measure, communicate.
Some other thoughts from Paul Nightingale:
— Monitoring process should be lightweight (when its going well!).
— Cross portfolio networking
— Academic research feeding into public policy debates is on Radio 4 all the time. Yet the average-spend on social sciences research for each UK resident is less than a gin and tonic worth per year.
— Impact doesn’t happen at the end of a research project.
— Early engagement is key.
Andrew Herbert then arrived and added the following thoughts:
— Impact opportunistic. We’re not managing for it. There are no impact strategies. I.e. if you have a good idea, who do you tell? What/where do you go with it?
— Too much digital, very little economy.
— Define measurable desired long range target:
— Link research and training strategies.
— Business management and researchers needed. To think about:
— Attraction of critical mass is important
— Steering Boards with teeth as a model. Like an executive director. Keeping the PIs on track.
— Soft money is very important.
I’ve not been able to track down a digital copy of the report yet, but as soon as I do, I will put a link here.
Today promises to be another interesting day, with poster presentations, a Dragons Den competition, and what look to be some great sessions. I will probably write up my notes for today on the train home tomorrow evening, so do look out for those here sometime on Thursday.
I’m going to be adding information about the DE2012 conference on this blog later today, but here is the presentation that I gave earlier on today about the Re-Reading the British Memorial project.
More to follow later!
I wrote a post last week, with Leif Isaksen, entitled ‘A Year of Open Archaeology’.
It’s over at the Open Knowledge Foundation Network blog:
There is an active, and very friendly Open Data in Archaeology Working Group that you can keep up to date with:
So come join the conversation: Everyone’s talking about Open!